REVIEW: AVENGERS: AGE OF ULTRON

For the longest time ever, I have been a fan of comic book superheroes and have taken a liking to Hollywood film adaptations of them. Therefore, it is no surprise that I am extremely eager to watch this movie I am about to review. After a tremendous billion dollar box-office success with The Avengers in 2012, comic book publishers Marvel green-lit a sequel for release in 2015.

The sequel in titled The Avengers: Age of Ultron. Joss Whedon returns to the helm to direct and write the film. The sequel reunites the cast from its predecessor; Robert Downey Jr., Chris Evans, Mark Ruffalo, Chris Hemsworth, Scarlett Johannson, Jeremy Renner, Paul Bettany, Samuel L. Jackson, and Cobie Smulders. Joining the assemble cast are Aaron Taylor-Johnson, Elizabeth Olson, and James Spader. As with all Marvel films, Kevin Feige returns as producer.

Will the sequel be better than the first film? Do read on…

Avengers Assemble!

SYNOPSIS:
The assemble of Earth’s mightiest heroes known as The Avengers is on assignment to retrieve Loki’s (villain from previous film) scepter hidden by Hydra in an Eastern European country. After successfully completing their mission, Tony Stark (Robert Downey Jr.) and Dr. Bruce Banner (Mark Ruffalo) decides to use the energy from the scepter to create a robot with artificial intelligence named Ultron. To their surprise, the robot Ultron begins to take a life of its own and is hell-bent on destroying Earth. It is up to our superheroes to stop it.

Bruce Banner/The Hulk (Mark Ruffalo) and Tony Stark/Iron Man (Robert Downey Jr.)

SCRIPT:
Scattered and mildly strong. Following the success of the first film which received raved reviews for its storyline, uncommon for comic book superhero films, this sequel was slightly disappointing. Although the storyline is pretty straight forward, at times it tends to cramp a lot all at once. It seems that Marvel is trying to set-up multiple storylines for future films involving each individual superhero character. In other words, there are too many sub-plots to supplement the main storyline plot. This eventually led to more dialogue scenes to explain a lot of what is going on in the film. On the bright side, the wit and humour is as good, and maybe even better, than the first film. Quite good characterization of roles as we get to see more of the human side of our heroes rather than focus on their special abilities.  

Captain America (Chris Evans) and Thor (Chris Hemsworth)

ACTING:
With an ensemble cast of established actors in one film, it is expected for each and every actor to bring their best to the screen. I am happy to say that all perform well. I particularly liked the performance of the new cast in Aaron Taylor-Johnson, Elizabeth Olsen, and James Spader. Although we only hear Spader’s voice, he sounded menacing as the main villain of the film. Paul Bettany, who in previous Marvel films only provided the voice of Stark’s artificial intelligence software Jarvis, is given a bigger role as a live-action member of the cast. His performance is remarkable and somewhat a scene stealer for the film.

Natasha Romanoff / Black Widow (Scarlett Johansson)

FILMING: 
Excellent but can be a little over the top. Director Joss Whedon is known to be true comic book fan. In my opinion, Whedon brought comic book artistry to life in the first film. He does it again with the second film and it is just as exciting. As with blockbuster movie franchises such as this, movie studios tend to provide more budget to produce sequels. Whedon took advantage of this by staging more spectacular action sequences and included more visual effects compared to the first film. Everything is on a bigger scale this time around. The visual effects are top notch and there are some very creative shots.

Director Joss Whedon on set with Clint Barton / Hawkeye (Jeremy Renner)

PACING:
Moderate at best. When there is a lot of dialogue to explain the film’s plot, it feels a little slow. However, it is balanced out with some wit and humour the Joss Whedon ‘style’.

Tony Stark / Iron Man building Ultron

TONE (MOOD):
As the world is faced against an unpredictable force of evil, our Earth’s mightiest superheroes must put aside their ago and petty differences to protect humanity from what could be a global disaster.

Newcomers Aaron Taylor-Johnson and Elizabeth Olsen as twins Quicksilver and Scarlett Witch

DOWNSIDE:
The editing could have been better. Multiple sub-plots can be turn-off for audiences.

Director Joss Whedon giving some pointers to Elizabeth Olsen

UPSIDE:
Great action sequences and visual effects which is complemented by some nifty sound effects design.

Captain Amerca / Steve Rogers (Chris Evans) in action

OVERALL: 
Personally, I feel the first film is better than this second film. However, it is worth a watch because it is highly entertaining. It is not necessary to watch the first film in order to understand the second film but it would be a better experience have seen both.


RATING:
7 out of 10.

REVIEW: FURIOUS 7

 

Back in 2001, a little known film about the world of street car drag racing titled The Fast and the Furious made its debut in cinemas. The film became a surprise hit and to this date has spawned six more sequels for a total of seven film in the movie franchise. Personally, I am a fan to the film series and have watched every movie in the film series. This seventh film in the series is not only anticipated because of its popularity but also due the fact that one of its leading actors did not complete the film. During a hiatus in production, actor Paul Walker was tragically killed in a motor vehicle accident.

 
The seventh film in the film series is titled Furious 7. A new director is at the helm in the name of horror master James Wan (Saw, The Conjuring, Insidious). The film reunites the core cast members from the previous films; Vin Diesel, Paul Walker, Tyrese Gibson, Michelle Rodriguez, Chris ‘Ludacris’ Bridges, Jordana Brewster, and Dwayne ‘The Rock’ Johnson. Joining the star-studded cast is action star Jason Statham and veteran actor Kurt Russell. Asian star from Thailand Tony Jaa also has a small role. The film is written by Chris Morgan and is produced yet again by Neal H. Moritz.

How will the seventh installment fair up this time? Do read on…

Muscle, fast cars, and family.

SYNOPSIS:
Dominic Torretto (Vin Diesel) and his gang return home to Los Angeles in hopes of starting afresh after their previous mission saw them defeating terrorist Owen Shaw (Luke Evans). As they are about to settle down with their families, Owen’s elder brother Deckard Shaw (Jason Statham) vows vengeance by threatening the lives of their loved ones. Deckard is revealed to be a very formidable foe. At the same time, a secret government organization led by Kurt Russell is also after Deckard. Together, the organization and Torretto’s gang form an alliance to track down Deckard.

(L-R): Tyrese Gibson, Michelle Rodriguez, Paul Walker, and Chris 'Ludacris' Bridges

SCRIPT: 

The storyline is surprisingly good and engaging. It has just the right amount of action and drama to make the film interesting. Despite the plot being a continuation of the previous sixth film, it can actually function as a stand-alone film even if the audience hasn’t watched the previous installments. There are also good comedic scenes to give the film some balance in between the action and drama. The plot is easy to understand and does not feel complicated. Even though there are many characters, each role is given sufficient time to develop. The film also managed to squeeze in a romantic subplot between the lead characters which fan of the film series will understand. There is a pretty moving tribute to Paul Walker in the end.

 

Dominic Torretto (Vin Diesel) getting ready for an action.

 

ACTING:
The characters of the film series is pretty much rooted in toughness and machoism. Since the same actors are reprising their roles, there’s not much stretch of the imagination required by the actors. I am pleased to say that everyone brought their ‘A’ game to the film. The addition of Jason Statham as the villain and Kurt Russell as a sort of ‘elder statesman’ brought freshness to the film. I liked the fact there is more screen time given to Tyrese Gibson and Chris “Ludacris’ Bridges to expand their roles as the film’s comic relief.

Jason Statham plays Deckard Shaw.

FILMING:
To be honest, I had doubts that James Wan would be able to pull it off directing an action film. Wan is known for horror films and I didn’t see how he could fit in enhancing the film series. I am pleased to say that he squashed my doubts and did a fantastic job in directing the film. The shots were creative in particular the action scenes. The fight scenes were choreographed neatly and the intensity was gripping. Some action scenes were quite intense which could make the audience member cringe in fear. The visual effects blended in seamlessly into the film which make it as though they were filmed using practical effects.

Star Vin Diesel and film's director James Wan

PACING:
Good pacing and rarely boring. Although at times when the pacing was slow, it managed pick-up pace with good dialogue and minor action scenes.

TONE (MOOD):
A group of ragtag criminals who intend to turn a new leaf must band together once again to battle an unexpected cunning enemy while risking their lives and loved ones.

The late Paul Walker in an action scene

UPSIDE:
Good story and good action scenes. I dare to say that it is even better than the previous films. Good mix of drama in between the testosterones of the film. Many positive elements of family, brotherhood, and teamwork.

DOWNSIDE:

Some plot lines and character development are related to previous films. If you haven’t seen previous film installments, you might not understand.

Hobbs (Dwayne Johnson) battle it out with Deckard (Jason Statham)

OVERALL:
In my opinion, this is the best one of all the seven films. The previous films were bombarded with constant action scenes while this film has a good balance. For fans of fight choreography, seeing Vin Diesel and Dwayne ‘The Rock’ Johnson go up against Jason Statham is worth the price of the ticket. I really like it!

For Paul

RATING:
8.5 out of 10

REVIEW: CHAPPIE

Hey there blog readers of Second Opinion. It has been awhile since I wrote a movie review. First and foremost, I would like to apologize for my absence. I have been watching films in cinemas but never got to sit down and write a movie review. Thank you for reading and being my loyal readers since I begin this blog in April 2013. From now on, I am going to write as much as I can whenever I get the chance.

 

 

The movie about I am about to review is one I have been waiting for as it is directed by one of my favourites, South African filmmaker Neill Blomkamp. He burst onto the scene with his directorial debut District 9 (2009) to critically acclaim. District 9 was nominated for four Academy Awards including Best Picture. District 9 is one of my favourites because it was film on a relatively low-budget but looked incredibly epic. Blomkamp followed up with Elysium (2013) starring Matt Damon and Jodie Foster.

Chappie is Blomkamp’s third directorial effort. Written by Blomkamp and Terri Tatchell, Chappie stars Shartlo Copley, Dev Patel, Hugh Jackman, and Sigourney Weaver. Copley has been in all of Blomkamp’s films and could be considered somewhat like his ‘muse’. The film is produced by Simon Kinberg with a motion picture score by renowned composer Hans Zimmer.

How will Blomkamp’s third feature fare? Do read on…

 

Introducing Chappie

SYNOPSIS:

In the not too distant future in the city of Johannesburg, South Africa, the city’s police force is now protected by humanoid-form robots known as scouts. These robots are supplied by a company called Tetravaal where the robots’ inventor Deon works. The popularity of the robot scouts eventually fueled resentment from another employee who is hell-bent on seeing them fail. An avid inventor, Deon soon develops a software which could allow the robots to think and feel like a human being. Using a robot scout as an experiment, he eventually succeeds in designing a robot scout named Chappie with consciousness albeit having the mind of young child. However, Chappie falls into the hands of criminal gangsters who have different motives.

Chappie and inventor Deon (Dev Patel)

SCRIPT: 

Original and interesting. As with Blomkamp’s previous films, he writes stories which are fresh but centers around the same themes of futuristic robots. The story structure is a little scattered but can be understood if you pay attention. The dialogue consist of many technical jargon. Good characterization of the lead and supporting characters. It is no different from Blomkamp’s previous films where it explores the struggle between the importance of a human element in a world surrounded by machines.

Actor Hugh Jackman wielding a gun

ACTING:

Actor Shartlo Copley plays the robot Chappie but he is not physically seen in the movie. His voice is heard through the robot and is quite likeable. Dev Patel did okay. Several supporting cast members of South African actors did well. Despite having a huge star in Hugh Jackman as the villain, his performance was eventually stole by the delightfulness of Chappie.

Chappie and some gangsters

FILMING:

The filmmaking technique and style does not stray away too much from Blomkamp’s previous films. The production design was nice. The cinematography was good too. However, the major credit has to be given to the visual effects in creating Chappie. Actor Shartlo Copley’s body movements of the robot, done through ‘Performance Capture” technique, was a delight to watch and definitely state of the art.

Director Neill Blomkamp on set

PACING:

Very slow in the beginning and tries to cramp in too much. But it slowly builds up to a nice climax in the end.

TONE (MOOD):

A journey of self-discovery in a world that is already corrupt with greed and only the strong will survive.

Chappie and Deon

DOWNSIDE:

A little slow on the pacing. Too much technical jargon. Script needs a little work.

UPSIDE:

The delightfulness that is the visual effects of the robot Chappie.

Chappie in action

OVERALL:

The movie is not too bad and not too good either. Enjoyable and fun.

RATING:

7 out of 10

REVIEW: THE HOBBIT: THE BATTLE OF THE FIVE ARMIES

Author J.R.R. Tolkien is no stranger to the literature community. His contribution to the world of fantasy and adventure has won the hearts of many avid book readers. His two most famous works are The Hobbit and Lord of the Rings which he wrote in the 1940s and 1950s. Filmmakers took the opportunity to capitalize on its popularity by adapting into film the three volumes from Lord of the Rings series in 2001, 2002, and 2003. Two years ago, The Hobbit (which is a prequel to the Lord of the Rings) was released in cinemas. The book was divided into three films which were released every subsequent year in 2012, 2013, and finally 2014.

After An Unexpected Journey (2012) and The Desolation of Smaug (2013), the final chapter hits the big screen with The Battle of the Five Armies. As usual, director Peter Jackson is at the helm just as he was on the previous two films and the Lord of the Rings trilogy. Returning cast members include Martin Freeman, Ian McKellen, Richard Armitage, Evangeline Lilly, Lee Pace, Luke Evans, Benedict Cumberbatch, Ken Stott, James Nesbitt, Cate Blanchett, Ian Holm, Christopher Lee, Hugo Weaving, and Orlando Bloom. The screenplay was written by Jackson, Fran Walsh, Phillippa Boyens, and Guillermo Del Toro.

Will the final chapter be a film of epic proportions? Do read on…

Martin Freeman is the lead role of the Hobbit named Bilbo Baggins

SYNOPSIS:

The Hobbit: The Battle of the Five Armies brings to an epic conclusion the adventures of Bilbo Baggins, Thorin Oakenshield and the Company of Dwarves. Having reclaimed their homeland from the Dragon Smaug, the Company has unwittingly unleashed a deadly force into the world. Enraged, Smaug rains his fiery wrath down upon the defenseless men, women and children of Lake-town. Obsessed above all else with his reclaimed treasure, Thorin sacrifices friendship and honor to hoard it as Bilbo's frantic attempts to make him see reason drive the Hobbit towards a desperate and dangerous choice. But there are even greater dangers ahead. Unseen by any but the Wizard Gandalf, the great enemy Sauron has sent forth legions of Orcs in a stealth attack upon the Lonely Mountain. As darkness converges on their escalating conflict, the races of Dwarves, Elves and Men must decide – unite or be destroyed. Bilbo finds himself fighting for his life and the lives of his friends in the epic Battle of the Five Armies, as the future of Middle-earth hangs in the balance.

Actor Luke Evans (Bard) and Orlando Bloom (Legolas) in a scene from the film 

SCRIPT: 

As the film is based on a novel, I believe the writers will stay true to the story’s plot. I have never read the book but to my knowledge, some characters were added to ‘spice’ up the film. Nevertheless, it would be tricky for the writers to make the script as interesting as possible. I am pleased to say that they did an excellent job. For a story which is set in a mythical fantasy land, the script manages to sustain my interest from scene to scene. The dialogue is not too complicated and far-fetched as one might expect but easily understandable throughout. Writing such a story material might result in isolating non-fans but it doesn’t. Everyone can relate to the story being told in the film. Good characterization for the roles. However, in order to understand the third film, you need to watch the first film An Unexpected Journey (2012) and The Desolation of Smaug (2013) to understand key plot points. There are some good thematic elements within like teamwork, bravery, and courage which was good.

Richard Armitage in a strong performance as Thorin Oakenshield

ACTING:

For an ensemble cast of stars, everyone shone in the film. It is very hard to single out one good performance but if I were to select one, it would be Richard Armitage as Thorin Oakenshield. His character was required to be the opposite of who he was in the first two films and he did this convincingly enough with his acting. Seeing veteran talented actors Ian McKellen, Cate Blanchett, Hugo Weaving, and Christopher Lee together on-screen was certainly a delight.

Veteran British actor Ian McKellen as the wizard Gandalf the Grey

FILMING:

When watching a Peter Jackson directed film, one can expect epic and grand scale filmmaking. And just like his other film, he delivers. The cinematography was very good and could easily transport the audience to the world of the film. The editing was snappy. The visual effects was spectacular and functioned well in enhancing the story. Great music to keep the audience engage in certain scenes.

Director Peter Jackson and actor Martin Freeman on the set of the film

PACING:

Good pacing from start to finish. For a film that is 144 minutes in duration, it did not feel that long.

TONE (MOOD):

A group of unlikely heroes and misfits set out to save their homeland from monstrous invaders and tyrants.

Evangelline Lilly as Tauriel 

DOWNSIDE:

If you don’t like fantasy action adventure films, this might not be your cup of tea.

UPSIDE:

For fans of the author and the series, you would like this film. Also, one does not need to be a fan of the books to like the film as the action adventure storyline is truly a delight.

Epic visual effects on a grand scale

OVERALL:

In conclusion, the film lived up its expectations of grandeur and adventure!

RATING:

8.5 out of 10

REVIEW: INTERSTELLAR

This is one film I have been waiting for so long to watch. I am a big fan of the director Christopher Nolan. Ever since he burst into the Hollywood movie scene with Memento (2000), he has directed 6 more films to with rave reviews from critics and audiences. Nolan is notably famous for reviving DC Comics superhero character on film with Batman Begins (2005), The Dark Knight (2008) and The Dark Knight Rises (2012). He gained even more recognition with the mind-blowing Inception (2010), a movie which I feel is the last true original story to come out from Hollywood.

His next film is Interstellar. Directed by Nolan who also co-wrote the screenplay with his brother Jonathan Nolan. The film stars Matthew McConaughey, Anne Hathaway, Michael Caine, Jessica Chastain, Mackenzie Foy, David Gyasi and John Lithgow. The film is co-distributed by Warner Bros. and Paramount Pictures.

How will Christopher Nolan’s latest film fare up with the rest? Do read on.

Matthew McConaughey in the male lead role of Cooper

SYNOPSIS:

In the not too distant future, planet Earth will be deemed almost inhabitable. Plantations are constantly ravaged by dust storms and humankind is reduced to being farmers. Former NASA test pilot named Cooper, who manages a corn plantation, is mysteriously called upon by his former employees to a secret NASA base. At this NASA base, he is thrust into piloting a spacecraft that would venture into outer space in search of possible new planets for humanity to continue its existence. Together with 3 other scientists, they venture into the far reaches of outer space. They soon discover unexpected challenges which test their limits human beings.

Anne Hathaway in the female lead role of Amelia Brand

SCRIPT: 

Original, adventurous, and magical. As with Nolan’s film Inception, he writes another script based on an original idea which is very rarely seen in Hollywood. The script has a solid structure with a good mix of science-fiction and drama. The premise of the story is a bit far-fetched but the story slowly makes us forget all the technical jargon as the script keeps us rooted in the drama. The plot holds many surprises and gets more interesting almost scene after scene. Despite a few minor plot holes, it is forgivable as the story focuses more on how the characters will overcome challenges. There are a lot of underlying themes about life throughout the movie which I feel was a positive addition. Good characterization for all characters.

Mackenzie Foy as Murphy, daughter of Cooper

ACTING:

The film has two Oscar winners, Matthew McConaughey and Anne Hathaway, in the leading roles. They did not disappoint. They both gave masterful performances worthy of awards and carried their characters well. However, they were outshone by strong supporting performances from Jessica Chastain and young Mackenzie Foy which should not be overlooked.

Searching for a new home

FILMING:

As with most science-fiction films, it is expected that visual effects plays a prominent role and in this film and it does. However, Nolan focuses more on the acting and the story rather than being dependent on the visual effects. The visual effects for the film are spectacular and do give the audience a scale on how large the universe is. The shots are creative and the editing is well organized. The cinematography is also a beautiful splendor to look at.

Christopher Nolan directing Matthew McConaughey on set. 

PACING:

A very good pacing despite a very slow start. The film builds up well in the middle with a good climax in the end. The film runs for about 2 hours and 45 minutes but it does not feel that long.

TONE (MOOD):

It is a race against time to ensure that the future of the human race lives on.

Beautiful cinematography

DOWNSIDE:

The long duration might turn off some people.

UPSIDE:

Lots of surprises and twists along the way. Good positive underlying themes about humanity in general.

The genius that is Christopher Nolan

OVERALL:

A must-watch and must not miss! Watch it in IMAX or halls with big screens. My vote for movie of the year.

RATING:

9.5 out of 10

REVIEW: ANAK JANTAN (Malaysia)

It has been awhile since I last reviewed a local Malaysian film. This time, I will be reviewing Anak Jantan, a local production from Malaysian film distributor Grand Brilliance. Anak Jantan, translated to English means male son. However, in this context the terms describes a sense of machoness and manly-hood.

Anak Jantan is directed by Faizul Rashid who previously helmed Bisikan Syaitan, also from Grand Brilliance. The film stars big names in the Malaysian film industry such as Farid Kamil, Nora Danish, Bront Palarae, Azhan Rani, Qi Razali, and Abu Bakar Omar. The film is written by Opie Harris and produced by famed producer Latiff Mohaideen.

How will this local film fare? Do read on…

SYNOPSIS:

 ‘ANAK JANTAN’ is the story of Darin who flees to Kuala Lumpur with Nara to begin a new life, away from Darin’s dark and violent past. But their happiness is short-lived when Somchai, Darin’s old ‘friend’ arrives in KL determined on exacting revenge. With the life of his son at stake, Darin has no choice but to confront his dark and vicious past and unintentionally sets in motion a chain of events with far reaching consequences! What is Darin really trying so hard to forget and why is Somchai hell bent on getting revenge on Darin?

Farid Kamil and Nora Danish as the male and female lead

SCRIPT: 

Original and fresh. The story is something new in Malaysian cinemas. It has a fresh concept in the action-drama genre. The story and plots were straight-forward and easy to understand. However, it could be improved more with a slightly better structured script. Characterization was too little and could have been developed more. Good thematic elements of redemption.

Farid Kamil having a chat with Azhan Rani

ACTING:

Very strong performances from Farid Kamil, Nora Danish, and Bront Palarae. It is great to see other supporting cast who tried to raise to meet the standards to the three main leads.

Nora Danish

FILMING:

Standard action film with a mix of drama. The shots could have been better but that opinion is very subjective. Pretty neat production design of the sets and wardrobe.

Bront Palarae standing over a dead body

PACING:

A little slow in the beginning but gradually builds up to a decent editing.

TONE (MOOD):

When greed and goals clash, friends become at odds and must battle each other.

Azhan Rani as an investigative cop

OVERALL:

A pretty decent film. It has a light action mood to it. Popcorn film.

RATING:

6.5 out of 10